1675
twierdzeń w rejestrze
656
opracowań badawczych
775
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
142
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
AI Versus Human-Delivered Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Symptoms in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14101325
„The primary outcome, anxiety levels as measured by the GAD-7, was analyzed using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle (n = 90). A sensitivity analysis using the per-protocol sample (n = 87) was also conducted.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„One hundred and two adults with SAD were randomized (1:1:1) to AI-PDT, AI-CBT, or a waitlist control.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„Both interventions yielded significant, moderate reductions in symptoms from baseline to post-treatment.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„with no significant differences observed between the two active treatments.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„At 1-month follow-up, the difference widened: AI-PDT became significantly superior to waitlist, while AI-CBT did not.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„Therapeutic alliance was established early in both conditions and remained stable throughout treatment.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„a parallel, 2-arm, unblinded, randomized controlled trial (N = 540)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„The genAI solution increases engagement frequency (2.4×) and duration (3.8×) compared to digital workbooks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„We observe comparable outcomes for anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Adverse events were comparable overall.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Does More Mean Better? Treatment Intensity and Predictors of Clinically Significant Change in Suicidal Ideation During Dialectical Behaviour Therapy
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70336
„Adults (n = 105) in a hospital-based DBT day treatment programme were triaged into three DBT intensity tracks over 12 weeks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Does group size matter? An evaluation of the impact of group size on DBT skills training outcomes
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x26100889
„Routinely collected data were analysed for 206 adults ... 12 participants (n = 103) or 20 participants (n = 103).”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Does group size matter? An evaluation of the impact of group size on DBT skills training outcomes
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x26100889
„The evaluation was under-powered to detect small effects.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Effectiveness and mechanisms of internet-delivered transdiagnostic CBT for students with adjustment disorder: the role of cognitive inflexibility, self-compassion, and mindfulness
RCT
DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2026.2720139
„A total of 181 students ... were randomized (2:2:1) to iCBT-UP (n=79), iPMR (n=63), or wait-list (n=39).”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Effectiveness and mechanisms of internet-delivered transdiagnostic CBT for students with adjustment disorder: the role of cognitive inflexibility, self-compassion, and mindfulness
RCT
DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2026.2720139
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A model of engagement in psychological therapy
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1017/s135246582610143x
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.