724
twierdzeń w rejestrze
297
opracowań badawczych
364
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
74
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial.
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„Nie odnotowano zgonów samobójczych ani innych zgonów w grupie obserwowanej po 12,4 roku.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„The sample consisted of 109 women with BPD, with 51.37% reporting multimethod NSSI.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„No significant bivariate correlations emerged for NSSI frequency or number of methods.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„The final ordinal model was statistically significant: chi-square(3) = 12.529, p = .006.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„Impulse, an adaptive CERQ factor and self-compassion remained significant in the final model.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„The cross-sectional observational design does not support causal inference.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„these differences were not statistically significant”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„relatively small sample size”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„not statistically significant at the final follow-up”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
An evidence-based integrated process framework of borderline personality disorder clinical features: Insights from the general population.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121148
„Cross-sectional data cannot establish temporal or causal ordering.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Functioning in the Context of Borderline Personality Disorder Features for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1111/eip.70112
„The pooled post-treatment effect on functioning was small and not statistically significant.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Functioning in the Context of Borderline Personality Disorder Features for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1111/eip.70112
„The final follow-up analysis also showed a small, non-significant pooled effect.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Could She Be Autistic? Exploring Gender Differences in Camouflaging and Pragmatics in Autism and Borderline Personality Disorder.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70210
„No significant between-group difference was observed for the total CAT-Q score among women.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Distress Intensity Predicts Selection of Reappraisal But Not Effectiveness of Distraction or Reappraisal During Uncertain Waiting Periods
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s42761-026-00403-7
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Distress Intensity Predicts Selection of Reappraisal But Not Effectiveness of Distraction or Reappraisal During Uncertain Waiting Periods
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s42761-026-00403-7
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Zastrzeżenie metodologiczne
Distress Intensity Predicts Selection of Reappraisal But Not Effectiveness of Distraction or Reappraisal During Uncertain Waiting Periods
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s42761-026-00403-7
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
PRACTICE_BOUNDARY
Distress Intensity Predicts Selection of Reappraisal But Not Effectiveness of Distraction or Reappraisal During Uncertain Waiting Periods
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s42761-026-00403-7
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of Slow-Paced Breathing as a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Anxiety—A Randomized Controlled Study
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s10484-025-09760-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of Slow-Paced Breathing as a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Anxiety—A Randomized Controlled Study
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s10484-025-09760-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Zastrzeżenie metodologiczne
Efficacy of Slow-Paced Breathing as a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Anxiety—A Randomized Controlled Study
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s10484-025-09760-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.