2098
twierdzeń w rejestrze
617
opracowań badawczych
1040
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
205
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Komentarz redakcyjny
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„relatively small sample size”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„not statistically significant at the final follow-up”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„Self-harm frequency was consistently lower throughout this long follow-up period ...”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„There were no significant differences in global functioning”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„increases engagement frequency (2.4×) and duration (3.8×) compared to digital workbooks”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„These rates of decline were comparable between groups for GAD-7... and PHQ-9...”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Competing interests: J.M., J.H., L.D., R.H. and M.R. are employed by Limbic Limited and hold shares in the company.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Structural features of borderline personality organization mediate the links between personality traits and depressive symptoms.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-34644-6
„The authors identify cross-sectional and convenience-sampling limitations and call for longitudinal clinical samples.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
An evidence-based integrated process framework of borderline personality disorder clinical features: Insights from the general population.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121148
„Cross-sectional data cannot establish temporal or causal ordering.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Functioning in the Context of Borderline Personality Disorder Features for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1111/eip.70112
„Seven trials with 657 participants met the inclusion criteria.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Functioning in the Context of Borderline Personality Disorder Features for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1111/eip.70112
„The pooled post-treatment effect on functioning was small and not statistically significant.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Functioning in the Context of Borderline Personality Disorder Features for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1111/eip.70112
„The final follow-up analysis also showed a small, non-significant pooled effect.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Functioning in the Context of Borderline Personality Disorder Features for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1111/eip.70112
„Only two included studies were judged to have low risk of bias.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Functioning in the Context of Borderline Personality Disorder Features for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1111/eip.70112
„The review reports limited and heterogeneous evidence and calls for stronger trials.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Could She Be Autistic? Exploring Gender Differences in Camouflaging and Pragmatics in Autism and Borderline Personality Disorder.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70210
„The final sample comprised 122 participants with ASD and 103 with BPD.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Could She Be Autistic? Exploring Gender Differences in Camouflaging and Pragmatics in Autism and Borderline Personality Disorder.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70210
„No significant between-group difference was observed for the total CAT-Q score among women.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Could She Be Autistic? Exploring Gender Differences in Camouflaging and Pragmatics in Autism and Borderline Personality Disorder.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70210
„Men showed a significant CAT-Q total difference and multiple significant pragmatic-language differences.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Could She Be Autistic? Exploring Gender Differences in Camouflaging and Pragmatics in Autism and Borderline Personality Disorder.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70210
„Each gender-diverse diagnostic group contained 12 participants; the analysis had low statistical power.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Could She Be Autistic? Exploring Gender Differences in Camouflaging and Pragmatics in Autism and Borderline Personality Disorder.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70210
„The authors describe the findings as tentative and call for replication.”