2305
twierdzeń w rejestrze
698
opracowań badawczych
1080
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
187
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„the full dataset comprised 810 simulated conversations ... spanning 6,329 turns”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„concerning behavior varied by simulated user vulnerability and interaction intent”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„concerning behavior scores increased as conversations progressed”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„SIM-VAIL simulates users with specific psychiatric vulnerabilities”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Eating Disorders With Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Clinical Implications
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70315
„Study designs included single case, uncontrolled pre-post, naturalistic longitudinal and nonrandomized comparative designs.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Eating Disorders With Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Clinical Implications
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70315
„DBT-based interventions were associated with reductions in eating disorder symptom severity, maladaptive eating behaviours and self-harm.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„43 eligible participants were assigned to either the intervention group (n = 23) or waitlist control group (n = 20).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„The 28-session program was translated into English and contextually modified.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„Depressive symptoms and negative automatic thoughts decreased to a greater extent in the intervention group.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„19 of 23 (82.61%) in the intervention group and all 20 (100%) in the waitlist control group completed assessments at all three time points.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„No significant interactions were found for college life adaptation or positive automatic thoughts.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Zastrzeżenie metodologiczne
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
PRACTICE_BOUNDARY
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„We identified 34 RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„full-model ACT was not superior ... (g = -0.01, p = .86)”