2747
twierdzeń w rejestrze
700
opracowań badawczych
1286
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
245
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
AI Versus Human-Delivered Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Symptoms in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14101325
„neither intervention demonstrated a statistically significant advantage over the no-intervention control group at post-intervention.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
AI Versus Human-Delivered Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Symptoms in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14101325
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
AI Versus Human-Delivered Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Symptoms in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14101325
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
AI Versus Human-Delivered Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Symptoms in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14101325
„The primary outcome, anxiety levels as measured by the GAD-7, was analyzed using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle (n = 90). A sensitivity analysis using the per-protocol sample (n = 87) was also conducted.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„One hundred and two adults with SAD were randomized (1:1:1) to AI-PDT, AI-CBT, or a waitlist control.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„Both interventions yielded significant, moderate reductions in symptoms from baseline to post-treatment.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„with no significant differences observed between the two active treatments.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„At 1-month follow-up, the difference widened: AI-PDT became significantly superior to waitlist, while AI-CBT did not.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„Therapeutic alliance was established early in both conditions and remained stable throughout treatment.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„a parallel, 2-arm, unblinded, randomized controlled trial (N = 540)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„The genAI solution increases engagement frequency (2.4×) and duration (3.8×) compared to digital workbooks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„We observe comparable outcomes for anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Adverse events were comparable overall.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
„Eighteen studies involving 1,705 participants contributed 19 comparisons.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
„No statistically significant difference in post-intervention OCD symptom severity was observed between dCBT and face-to-face CBT.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
„dCBT was associated with significantly lower post-intervention OCD symptom severity than active psychological controls and passive controls.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.