2450
twierdzeń w rejestrze
654
opracowań badawczych
1197
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
242
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Samoujawnianie i antropomorfizacja wpływają na komfort rozmowy z chatbotem AI
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-72496-w
„WSD showed the strongest unique association with FC.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
„The present article presents and reviews the model of psychopathology and treatment underlying Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
„Psychological flexibility is established through six core ACT processes.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
„The evidence ... relevant to the model are broadly supportive, but the literature is not mature and many questions have not yet been examined.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
„There are not enough well-controlled studies to conclude that ACT is generally more effective than other active treatments across the range of problems examined.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
AI Versus Human-Delivered Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Symptoms in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14101325
„Both AI and human-delivered interventions led to significant within-group reductions in anxiety.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„One hundred and two adults with SAD were randomized (1:1:1) to AI-PDT, AI-CBT, or a waitlist control.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„Both interventions yielded significant, moderate reductions in symptoms from baseline to post-treatment.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„with no significant differences observed between the two active treatments.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„At 1-month follow-up, the difference widened: AI-PDT became significantly superior to waitlist, while AI-CBT did not.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„Therapeutic alliance was established early in both conditions and remained stable throughout treatment.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„a parallel, 2-arm, unblinded, randomized controlled trial (N = 540)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„The genAI solution increases engagement frequency (2.4×) and duration (3.8×) compared to digital workbooks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„We observe comparable outcomes for anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Adverse events were comparable overall.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
„Eighteen studies involving 1,705 participants contributed 19 comparisons.”