1546
twierdzeń w rejestrze
472
opracowań badawczych
835
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
138
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Treatment modifiers of interpersonal functioning in psychotherapy for people with borderline personality disorder: Systematic review with meta-analyses of individual participant data.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102707
„Moderator findings were not statistically significant after correction; psychotherapy should not be withheld solely based on complexity.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Effectiveness of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy in a Multidisciplinary Veterans Health Care Setting
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1111/famp.70110
„The sample consisted of 79 diverse couples (n=158) that completed a mean of 16 sessions. Reliable change indices showed 18.9% and 40.4% ... significantly improved.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dietary patterns and emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder and eating disorders as a shared mechanism underlying symptom severity.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-36068-2
„The four groups comprised 40 BPD, 37 BPD+ED, 22 ED and 37 healthy controls.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dietary patterns and emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder and eating disorders as a shared mechanism underlying symptom severity.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-36068-2
„DERS scores were highest in the BPD+ED group and lowest in healthy controls.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„The sample consisted of 109 women with BPD, with 51.37% reporting multimethod NSSI.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„No significant bivariate correlations emerged for NSSI frequency or number of methods.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„The final ordinal model was statistically significant: chi-square(3) = 12.529, p = .006.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„Impulse, an adaptive CERQ factor and self-compassion remained significant in the final model.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Psychological correlates of nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder: a cross-sectional study to inform mindfulness-based interventions.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-07740-0
„The cross-sectional observational design does not support causal inference.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„This adult life follow-up ... showed that DBT-A was associated with consistently lower self-harm rates throughout the 12.4 year follow-up.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„A total of 540 participants are recruited and randomized... both self-guided over six weeks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Limbic Care’s genAI features utilize a sophisticated AI architecture that combines LLMs with a safety and clinical governance system...”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„the app intervention participants opened the app a total of 9.6 ± 10.2 times... more than double (2.4 times) the frequency of the control group.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„increases engagement frequency (2.4×) and duration (3.8×) compared to digital workbooks”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„These rates of decline were comparable between groups for GAD-7... and PHQ-9...”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„The intervention group (n = 317) showed a mean reduction... of -2.46 ± 3.94 on the GAD-7 and -2.67 ± 4.09 on the PHQ-9. Similarly, the control group... -3.13 ± 4.09... and -2.68 ± 4.55.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„exploratory analyses suggested that participants who chose to engage with... clinical personalization... experienced stronger anxiety symptom reduction”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Nine participants from the control group are excluded from analysis due to protocol deviations.”