1161
twierdzeń w rejestrze
369
opracowań badawczych
604
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
91
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dietary patterns and emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder and eating disorders as a shared mechanism underlying symptom severity.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-36068-2
„The four groups comprised 40 BPD, 37 BPD+ED, 22 ED and 37 healthy controls.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dietary patterns and emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder and eating disorders as a shared mechanism underlying symptom severity.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-36068-2
„DERS scores were highest in the BPD+ED group and lowest in healthy controls.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Adult life outcomes for adolescents 12.4 years after dialectical behavior therapy - a randomized clinical trial
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02856-w
„80% of participants ... reported to have had no NSSI”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„A total of 540 participants are recruited and randomized... both self-guided over six weeks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Limbic Care’s genAI features utilize a sophisticated AI architecture that combines LLMs with a safety and clinical governance system...”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„the app intervention participants opened the app a total of 9.6 ± 10.2 times... more than double (2.4 times) the frequency of the control group.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„increases engagement frequency (2.4×) and duration (3.8×) compared to digital workbooks”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„These rates of decline were comparable between groups for GAD-7... and PHQ-9...”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„The intervention group (n = 317) showed a mean reduction... of -2.46 ± 3.94 on the GAD-7 and -2.67 ± 4.09 on the PHQ-9. Similarly, the control group... -3.13 ± 4.09... and -2.68 ± 4.55.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„exploratory analyses suggested that participants who chose to engage with... clinical personalization... experienced stronger anxiety symptom reduction”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Nine participants from the control group are excluded from analysis due to protocol deviations.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Competing interests: J.M., J.H., L.D., R.H. and M.R. are employed by Limbic Limited and hold shares in the company.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Structural features of borderline personality organization mediate the links between personality traits and depressive symptoms.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-34644-6
„The online sample included 709 participants; 15 non-binary participants were excluded from gender-controlled analyses.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
An evidence-based integrated process framework of borderline personality disorder clinical features: Insights from the general population.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121148
„Emotional dysregulation showed the strongest predictive contribution across the model.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Distraction over reappraisal strategies in interpersonal emotion regulation: associations with emotional difficulties
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2507692
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
PRACTICE_BOUNDARY
Distraction over reappraisal strategies in interpersonal emotion regulation: associations with emotional difficulties
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2507692
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Distress Intensity Predicts Selection of Reappraisal But Not Effectiveness of Distraction or Reappraisal During Uncertain Waiting Periods
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s42761-026-00403-7
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
PRACTICE_BOUNDARY
Distress Intensity Predicts Selection of Reappraisal But Not Effectiveness of Distraction or Reappraisal During Uncertain Waiting Periods
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s42761-026-00403-7
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.