1589
twierdzeń w rejestrze
663
opracowań badawczych
648
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
85
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A Randomized Controlled Trial of A Gamified Digital Mental Health Intervention for Child Anxiety
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-02097-1
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Human–GenAI w ekspozycji na lęk akademicki: dwa RCT
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-03199-9
„Across two randomized controlled trials (N = 425) ...”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Human–GenAI w ekspozycji na lęk akademicki: dwa RCT
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-03199-9
„Across two randomized controlled trials (N = 425) ...”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Human–GenAI w ekspozycji na lęk akademicki: dwa RCT
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-03199-9
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
„We conducted a 2 × 2 randomized vignette experiment with 768 college students.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
„Privacy assurance increased perceived privacy protection, F(1, 764) = 159.30, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.172, d = 0.91.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
„Professional-boundary warning increased boundary awareness, F(1, 764) = 176.40, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.188, d = 0.96.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
„calibrated trust was highest when both cues were present.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
„boundary awareness was linked to lower overreliance risk and stronger professional help-seeking intention.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„the full dataset comprised 810 simulated conversations ... spanning 6,329 turns”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„concerning behavior varied by simulated user vulnerability and interaction intent”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„concerning behavior scores increased as conversations progressed”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„SIM-VAIL simulates users with specific psychiatric vulnerabilities”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Eating Disorders With Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Clinical Implications
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70315
„DBT-based interventions were associated with reductions in eating disorder symptom severity, maladaptive eating behaviours and self-harm.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„43 eligible participants were assigned to either the intervention group (n = 23) or waitlist control group (n = 20).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„The 28-session program was translated into English and contextually modified.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„Depressive symptoms and negative automatic thoughts decreased to a greater extent in the intervention group.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„19 of 23 (82.61%) in the intervention group and all 20 (100%) in the waitlist control group completed assessments at all three time points.”