1646
twierdzeń w rejestrze
665
opracowań badawczych
737
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
149
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A Randomized Controlled Trial of A Gamified Digital Mental Health Intervention for Child Anxiety
RCT
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-02097-1
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
„We conducted a 2 × 2 randomized vignette experiment with 768 college students.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„the full dataset comprised 810 simulated conversations ... spanning 6,329 turns”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„concerning behavior varied by simulated user vulnerability and interaction intent”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„concerning behavior scores increased as conversations progressed”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04577-2
„SIM-VAIL simulates users with specific psychiatric vulnerabilities”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Eating Disorders With Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Clinical Implications
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70315
„Study designs included single case, uncontrolled pre-post, naturalistic longitudinal and nonrandomized comparative designs.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Eating Disorders With Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Clinical Implications
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70315
„DBT-based interventions were associated with reductions in eating disorder symptom severity, maladaptive eating behaviours and self-harm.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„43 eligible participants were assigned to either the intervention group (n = 23) or waitlist control group (n = 20).”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
PRACTICE_BOUNDARY
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Twenty-one studies were included in the scoping review.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Autistic and non-autistic midwives' experiences of caring for autistic women and birthing-people
Jakościowe
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2026.104933
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The four studies ... provided data from N = 301 clients ... including a total of 18 correlational effect sizes.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The studies included treatments from different theoretical frameworks, such as psychodynamic psychotherapy ... cognitive behavioral therapy.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The meta-analysis does not directly test temporal or causal ordering and does not examine rupture repair as an intervention.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Bringing cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares to patients with trauma: increasing access and feasibility via primary and acute care
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s44470-026-00108-5
„85.7% preferred video; 71.4% said in-person would be difficult.”