2193
twierdzeń w rejestrze
699
opracowań badawczych
963
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
221
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„One hundred and two adults with SAD were randomized (1:1:1) to AI-PDT, AI-CBT, or a waitlist control.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„Both interventions yielded significant, moderate reductions in symptoms from baseline to post-treatment.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„with no significant differences observed between the two active treatments.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„At 1-month follow-up, the difference widened: AI-PDT became significantly superior to waitlist, while AI-CBT did not.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
„Therapeutic alliance was established early in both conditions and remained stable throughout treatment.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Anna vs. Judith: A randomized comparison of AI-delivered psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies for social anxiety disorder
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100960
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„a parallel, 2-arm, unblinded, randomized controlled trial (N = 540)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„The genAI solution increases engagement frequency (2.4×) and duration (3.8×) compared to digital workbooks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„We observe comparable outcomes for anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Adverse events were comparable overall.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
„Eighteen studies involving 1,705 participants contributed 19 comparisons.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
„No statistically significant difference in post-intervention OCD symptom severity was observed between dCBT and face-to-face CBT.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
„dCBT was associated with significantly lower post-intervention OCD symptom severity than active psychological controls and passive controls.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
The efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-08634-5
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Does More Mean Better? Treatment Intensity and Predictors of Clinically Significant Change in Suicidal Ideation During Dialectical Behaviour Therapy
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70336
„Adults (n = 105) in a hospital-based DBT day treatment programme were triaged into three DBT intensity tracks over 12 weeks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Does More Mean Better? Treatment Intensity and Predictors of Clinically Significant Change in Suicidal Ideation During Dialectical Behaviour Therapy
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70336
„Adults (n = 105) in a hospital-based DBT day treatment programme were triaged into three DBT intensity tracks over 12 weeks.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Does More Mean Better? Treatment Intensity and Predictors of Clinically Significant Change in Suicidal Ideation During Dialectical Behaviour Therapy
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70336
„Suicidal ideation decreased significantly over time, with no differences across treatment intensity levels.”