892
twierdzeń w rejestrze
325
opracowań badawczych
470
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
103
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The effectiveness of CBT-based NLP-enabled AI conversational agents for mental health intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02886-x
„CBT-based CAs demonstrated a small to medium effect”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The effectiveness of CBT-based NLP-enabled AI conversational agents for mental health intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02886-x
„the new ES became non-significant”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The effectiveness of CBT-based NLP-enabled AI conversational agents for mental health intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02886-x
„CBT-based CAs demonstrated a non-significant effect on stress”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The effectiveness of CBT-based NLP-enabled AI conversational agents for mental health intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02886-x
„Only one study met all six”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The effectiveness of CBT-based NLP-enabled AI conversational agents for mental health intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02886-x
„cannot be directly generalized to generative AI systems”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The effectiveness of CBT-based NLP-enabled AI conversational agents for mental health intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02886-x
„including only English-language publications”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
The effectiveness of CBT-based NLP-enabled AI conversational agents for mental health intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02886-x
„GenAI chatbots ... should not be used as a replacement”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Health advisory: Use of generative AI chatbots and wellness applications for mental health
Metaanaliza
„GenAI chatbots ... should not be used as a replacement”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
The effectiveness of CBT-based NLP-enabled AI conversational agents for mental health intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02886-x
„based on only two studies”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Attachment Behavior Change Following Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Spanish-Speaking Couples
RCT
DOI: 10.1111/jmft.70173
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Attachment Behavior Change Following Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Spanish-Speaking Couples
RCT
DOI: 10.1111/jmft.70173
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Human–GenAI w ekspozycji na lęk akademicki: dwa RCT
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-03199-9
„Across two randomized controlled trials (N = 425) ...”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
„We conducted a 2 × 2 randomized vignette experiment with 768 college students.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
RCT
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934264
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„43 eligible participants were assigned to either the intervention group (n = 23) or waitlist control group (n = 20).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„The 28-session program was translated into English and contextually modified.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„Depressive symptoms and negative automatic thoughts decreased to a greater extent in the intervention group.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„19 of 23 (82.61%) in the intervention group and all 20 (100%) in the waitlist control group completed assessments at all three time points.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„No significant interactions were found for college life adaptation or positive automatic thoughts.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.