2149
twierdzeń w rejestrze
583
opracowań badawczych
1075
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
176
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„the app intervention participants opened the app a total of 9.6 ± 10.2 times... more than double (2.4 times) the frequency of the control group.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„increases engagement frequency (2.4×) and duration (3.8×) compared to digital workbooks”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„These rates of decline were comparable between groups for GAD-7... and PHQ-9...”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„The intervention group (n = 317) showed a mean reduction... of -2.46 ± 3.94 on the GAD-7 and -2.67 ± 4.09 on the PHQ-9. Similarly, the control group... -3.13 ± 4.09... and -2.68 ± 4.55.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„exploratory analyses suggested that participants who chose to engage with... clinical personalization... experienced stronger anxiety symptom reduction”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Nine participants from the control group are excluded from analysis due to protocol deviations.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Increasing engagement with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) using generative AI: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
RCT
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-01321-8
„Competing interests: J.M., J.H., L.D., R.H. and M.R. are employed by Limbic Limited and hold shares in the company.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Structural features of borderline personality organization mediate the links between personality traits and depressive symptoms.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-34644-6
„The online sample included 709 participants; 15 non-binary participants were excluded from gender-controlled analyses.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Structural features of borderline personality organization mediate the links between personality traits and depressive symptoms.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-34644-6
„Depressive symptoms correlated strongly with emotional stability and primitive defenses.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Structural features of borderline personality organization mediate the links between personality traits and depressive symptoms.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-34644-6
„Identity diffusion and fear of fusion showed strong positive associations with depressive symptoms.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Structural features of borderline personality organization mediate the links between personality traits and depressive symptoms.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-34644-6
„Multiple mediation was estimated with 5000 bootstrap resamples.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Structural features of borderline personality organization mediate the links between personality traits and depressive symptoms.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-34644-6
„The authors identify cross-sectional and convenience-sampling limitations and call for longitudinal clinical samples.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
An evidence-based integrated process framework of borderline personality disorder clinical features: Insights from the general population.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121148
„The general-population sample included 694 adults.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
An evidence-based integrated process framework of borderline personality disorder clinical features: Insights from the general population.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121148
„Emotional dysregulation showed the strongest predictive contribution across the model.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
An evidence-based integrated process framework of borderline personality disorder clinical features: Insights from the general population.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121148
„The integrated framework combines emotional, self-functioning, interpersonal-sensitivity and behavioral dimensions.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
An evidence-based integrated process framework of borderline personality disorder clinical features: Insights from the general population.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121148
„The authors present a provisional integrated framework and call for clinical and longitudinal validation.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
An evidence-based integrated process framework of borderline personality disorder clinical features: Insights from the general population.
Obserwacyjne
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121148
„Cross-sectional data cannot establish temporal or causal ordering.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Functioning in the Context of Borderline Personality Disorder Features for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1111/eip.70112
„Seven trials with 657 participants met the inclusion criteria.”