3094
twierdzeń w rejestrze
700
opracowań badawczych
1470
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
293
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Eating Disorders With Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Clinical Implications
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70315
„Baseline BPD symptom severity did not consistently predict poorer outcomes and, in some cases, was associated with greater early improvements.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Eating Disorders With Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Clinical Implications
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70315
„Many studies included concurrent treatments ... limiting attribution of effects exclusively to DBT.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„43 eligible participants were assigned to either the intervention group (n = 23) or waitlist control group (n = 20).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„The 28-session program was translated into English and contextually modified.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„Depressive symptoms and negative automatic thoughts decreased to a greater extent in the intervention group.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„19 of 23 (82.61%) in the intervention group and all 20 (100%) in the waitlist control group completed assessments at all three time points.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„No significant interactions were found for college life adaptation or positive automatic thoughts.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Zastrzeżenie metodologiczne
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
PRACTICE_BOUNDARY
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„We identified 34 RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„full-model ACT was not superior ... (g = -0.01, p = .86)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„lack of preregistration ... inadequate statistical power ... limited use of intent-to-treat analyses”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„comparison ... to bona fide psychotherapies”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Twenty-one studies were included in the scoping review.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Seven databases were searched; 1,899 records were identified and 21 studies were included.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Most interventions were text-based, CBT-informed, and at an early stage of development.”