1836
twierdzeń w rejestrze
663
opracowań badawczych
845
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
177
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
„No significant interactions were found for college life adaptation or positive automatic thoughts.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
A randomized controlled trial of an app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for international students
RCT
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2026.100984
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
PRACTICE_BOUNDARY
Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Twenty-one studies were included in the scoping review.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„SMD of BA for adult outpatients compared with control conditions was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.80; k=61)”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Autistic and non-autistic midwives' experiences of caring for autistic women and birthing-people
Jakościowe
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2026.104933
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The four studies ... provided data from N = 301 clients ... including a total of 18 correlational effect sizes.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The studies included treatments from different theoretical frameworks, such as psychodynamic psychotherapy ... cognitive behavioral therapy.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The meta-analysis does not directly test temporal or causal ordering and does not examine rupture repair as an intervention.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychotherapy for PTSD – a scoping review of how change during treatment has been studied
Scoping review
DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2026.2679314
„Most studies were conducted in the United States (82%) involving veterans or active military (50%).”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychotherapy for PTSD – a scoping review of how change during treatment has been studied
Scoping review
DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2026.2679314
„PE (50%) and CPT (31%) dominated the treatment landscape.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Psychotherapy for PTSD – a scoping review of how change during treatment has been studied
Scoping review
DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2026.2679314
„The review mapped research practices rather than providing an overview of effect sizes for treatment response.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.2196/76028
„COS n=79, APP n=39; separately recruited waitlist n=48.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.2196/76028
„COS consisted of seven sessions; 61% completed all sessions and 84% attended at least five.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.2196/76028
„COS baseline-to-post difference ... d=1.38.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.2196/76028
„COS showed a significantly greater reduction ... compared with waitlist ... d=0.68.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.2196/76028
„BSS T1 COS 9.78; T2 COS 6.01; within-group d=0.71.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.2196/76028
„The program integrates structured CBT techniques with peer-led/self-help group dynamics.”