2543
twierdzeń w rejestrze
682
opracowań badawczych
1208
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
253
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„full-model ACT was not superior ... (g = -0.01, p = .86)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„lack of preregistration ... inadequate statistical power ... limited use of intent-to-treat analyses”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Randomized controlled evidence of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102786
„comparison ... to bona fide psychotherapies”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Twenty-one studies were included in the scoping review.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Seven databases were searched; 1,899 records were identified and 21 studies were included.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Most interventions were text-based, CBT-informed, and at an early stage of development.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Moderate-to-high usability, therapeutic alliance and satisfaction were reported; inaccurate or contextually misaligned outputs eroded trust.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„We included 105 trials (13,933 patients)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„SMD of BA for adult outpatients compared with control conditions was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.80; k=61)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„high heterogeneity (I² = 71%) and a broad 95% prediction interval (-0.11 to 1.46)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„We found no significant difference between BA and other therapies (k=27; SMD=0.04; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.18)”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Autistic and non-autistic midwives' experiences of caring for autistic women and birthing-people
Jakościowe
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2026.104933
„Mała próba jakościowa i perspektywa personelu, a nie bezpośrednia ocena wyników klinicznych kobiet.”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Autistic and non-autistic midwives' experiences of caring for autistic women and birthing-people
Jakościowe
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2026.104933
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The four studies ... provided data from N = 301 clients ... including a total of 18 correlational effect sizes.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„z = −0.22, SE = 0.04, 95 CI [−0.303, −0.133]; t(17) = −5.40, p < 0.001, r = −0.21.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The studies included treatments from different theoretical frameworks, such as psychodynamic psychotherapy ... cognitive behavioral therapy.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The meta-analysis does not directly test temporal or causal ordering and does not examine rupture repair as an intervention.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Bringing cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares to patients with trauma: increasing access and feasibility via primary and acute care
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s44470-026-00108-5
„34 randomized so far; 85.1% interest in nightmare treatment; 76.5% initiated treatment.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Bringing cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares to patients with trauma: increasing access and feasibility via primary and acute care
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s44470-026-00108-5
„85.7% preferred video; 71.4% said in-person would be difficult.”