1855
twierdzeń w rejestrze
659
opracowań badawczych
864
Dowodów empirycznych (FACT)
165
Granic wiedzy / niepewności
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Twenty-one studies were included in the scoping review.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Seven databases were searched; 1,899 records were identified and 21 studies were included.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Most interventions were text-based, CBT-informed, and at an early stage of development.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
„Moderate-to-high usability, therapeutic alliance and satisfaction were reported; inaccurate or contextually misaligned outputs eroded trust.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Generative AI mental health chatbots: a scoping review of intervention design and user experience
Przegląd systematyczny
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02972-0
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„We included 105 trials (13,933 patients)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„SMD of BA for adult outpatients compared with control conditions was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.80; k=61)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„high heterogeneity (I² = 71%) and a broad 95% prediction interval (-0.11 to 1.46)”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783
„We found no significant difference between BA and other therapies (k=27; SMD=0.04; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.18)”
Wniosek pośredni / Interpretacja
Autistic and non-autistic midwives' experiences of caring for autistic women and birthing-people
Jakościowe
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2026.104933
Brak zarejestrowanego dosłownego cytatu.
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The four studies ... provided data from N = 301 clients ... including a total of 18 correlational effect sizes.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„z = −0.22, SE = 0.04, 95 CI [−0.303, −0.133]; t(17) = −5.40, p < 0.001, r = −0.21.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The studies included treatments from different theoretical frameworks, such as psychodynamic psychotherapy ... cognitive behavioral therapy.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Alliance Ruptures and Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Their Association
Metaanaliza
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70192
„The meta-analysis does not directly test temporal or causal ordering and does not examine rupture repair as an intervention.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Bringing cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares to patients with trauma: increasing access and feasibility via primary and acute care
Inne / nieokreślone
DOI: 10.1007/s44470-026-00108-5
„The article focuses on access and feasibility and describes an ongoing pilot rather than a definitive efficacy trial.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychotherapy for PTSD – a scoping review of how change during treatment has been studied
Scoping review
DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2026.2679314
„After a three-phase screening, 115 studies met inclusion criteria.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Psychotherapy for PTSD – a scoping review of how change during treatment has been studied
Scoping review
DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2026.2679314
„PE (50%) and CPT (31%) dominated the treatment landscape.”
Niepewność / Granica dowodu
Psychotherapy for PTSD – a scoping review of how change during treatment has been studied
Scoping review
DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2026.2679314
„The review mapped research practices rather than providing an overview of effect sizes for treatment response.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.2196/76028
„COS n=79, APP n=39; separately recruited waitlist n=48.”
Dowód empiryczny (Dane ze źródła)
Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT
DOI: 10.2196/76028
„COS consisted of seven sessions; 61% completed all sessions and 84% attended at least five.”